Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Jan 2012 22:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 503385
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-24
It was 'rename your unofficial version of Firefox to something else', exactly what Google tell people who would try to distribute unofficial versions under the Chrome trademark.
The reason they enforce this should be obvious.
Likewise, Mozilla's cavalier treatment of the very reasonable objections of the Firebird Database devs, whose project name Mozilla stole, left something to be desired.
Of this I know nothing.
And then there is the continued treatment of non-Windows OSes as 2nd class citizens.
Are you claiming Chrome (which you endorsed) was treating Linux as a 1st class citizen? How long did it take for them to even get a Linux port out? Even longer to get it up to par with the Windows version.
I remember you well from all the vitriol you've spread here on OSNews over the years, and seeing you back from your hiatus the first post I see is one where you're back to your usual FSF hate fest, picking up right where you left off. So yes, I think you are nurturing the same old 'vendetta' of which we've seen countless examples of in the past. Unfortunately.
I don't know you personally.