Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jan 2012 22:45 UTC, submitted by bowkota
Thread beginning with comment 503435
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes, I was rather crude there, excuse my behaviour.
That's OK. Generally it's always better to attack the ideas rather than the person but we all slip sometimes. I know I do. There is some thing about internet text based discourse (email, commenting etc) that seems to militate against civility.
You are being unfair.
For such a large amount of quality trolling on any kind of company fanboy, I would give you a +1 (Insightful).
There is really no such good OS product on the market today that any OS-manufacturing company deserves its users' protection. Which is why maintaining computer hardware open to new OS actors is so important...




Member since:
2008-06-03
Yes, I was rather crude there, excuse my behaviour.
Regarding DT, I don't know and couldn't care less. I'm not signed up there and just click on DT articles linked on AnandTech every once in a while. OSnews is the only site I come to troll on. The comment system at DT is probably as flawed as the voting system on OSnews, but no tech-site does this right anyways.
Blame Apple for the advent of the tasteless hipster (hipsters in the past had taste, at least) and I'll get flamed by you, insult WP7/MS or the general uptightness of .NET devs and I'll get flamed by that maximus fellow, insult Android and call it a bloated Java-VM that took the freedom it promised the people and gave it to OEMs and Carriers instead (becoming the Windows of the smartphone world in the process), and everyone else here will flame me.
Doesn't change anything.