Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Jan 2012 22:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 503639
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
Not quite. BSD-Lite and BSD-Lite2 were developed because AT&T owned the copyright to 6 files in BSD.
BSD did not run on the Intel x86 architecture, so 386BSD was developed by Bill Jolie. However, there was a big hullaballoo around the incorporation of third-party patches into 386BSD, and users had to download these huge patchsets in order to make it work on their machines. Out of that mess came NetBSD and FreeBSD (started independently of each other, both based on 386BSD).
Shortly after NetBSD and FreeBSD were launched, BSD-Lite2 was released. FreeBSD then rebased their code on BSD-Lite2. Not sure when/if NetBSD did the same.
And then a little while after that, Theo had a falling out with the NetBSD core devs, and OpenBSD was born.
And many years after that, Matt had a bit of a falling out with the FreeBSD core devs, and DragonflyBSD was born.