Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Jan 2012 13:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 503747
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I am not sure he actually gave the speech in a "public" place. Further, as the author he has some rights to how its distributed. I don't like the way it is but not sure how I would change things.
The speech was given on August 28, 1963. It was given in Washington, DC in front of the Lincoln Memorial. This is most definitely a public place.
I am not sure he actually gave the speech in a "public" place. Further, as the author he has some rights to how its distributed. I don't like the way it is but not sure how I would change things.
Sure you get a temporary monopoly on your work but 70+ years? I would love to get paid over and over again for the same work I did decades ago but I wouldn't find it fair.
Sure you get a temporary monopoly on your work but 70+ years? I would love to get paid over and over again for the same work I did decades ago but I wouldn't find it fair.
Indeed - the whole thing is absurd.
My girlfriend is a school teacher and it would be great if she got royalties for every occasion that her pupils applied lessons they'd learned from her - both present and any time in the future. However the world doesn't work that way - or at least shouldn't.
Well, part of the issue is that he isn't the author for a fair portion of his works. He plagiarized a great deal (that we know), including the ending of his "I Have A Dream" speech. That said, he was a great orator that brought about a great social change, but his family has some gall to use copyright like this.





Member since:
2006-01-14
I am not sure he actually gave the speech in a "public" place. Further, as the author he has some rights to how its distributed. I don't like the way it is but not sure how I would change things.