To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sure you get a temporary monopoly on your work but 70+ years? I would love to get paid over and over again for the same work I did decades ago but I wouldn't find it fair.
Indeed - the whole thing is absurd.
My girlfriend is a school teacher and it would be great if she got royalties for every occasion that her pupils applied lessons they'd learned from her - both present and any time in the future. However the world doesn't work that way - or at least shouldn't.
Oh I think it does work that way (in broader context, not only ~copyright & performances); it's generally less clear than people like to make it out to be (and needs better arguments - or, too often, any arguments - for why one "can't" benefit from items which are more in the virtual sphere)
After all - from a "normal" property (or, say, one intermediate thing from my place http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_usufruct ) your heirs can obviously benefit, also without work on their part, long after you're dead. Property which now, ultimately, is just a snippet in some databases (so sort of "virtual" - and sure, one might say that's a value attached to physical, hence scarce, goods, but a) we clearly treat agreed values of different kinds of goods as interchangeable b) at the very least, "virtual goods" tend to be made by humans - hence are also impacted by scarcities)
Yeah, it will be a mess to figure out / "not sure how I would change things"




Member since:
2006-04-10
Sure you get a temporary monopoly on your work but 70+ years? I would love to get paid over and over again for the same work I did decades ago but I wouldn't find it fair.