Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Jan 2012 13:13 UTC
In the News "Martin Luther King Jr.'s 'I Have a Dream' speech is considered one of the most recognizable collection of words in American history. It's the rhetorical equivalent of a national treasure or a national park. The National Park Service inscribed it on the Lincoln Memorial and the Library of Congress put it into its National Recording Registry. So we might hold it to be self evident that it can be spread freely. Not exactly. Any unauthorized usage of the speech and a number of other speeches by King - including in PBS documentaries - is a violation of American law. You'd be hard pressed to find a good complete video version on the web, and it's not even to be found in the new digital archive of the King Center's website. If you want to watch the whole thing, legally, you'll need to get the $20 DVD." I'm probably too young and too non-American to really fully grasp just how important Mr King was to a segregated America, but the fact that his influential and world-changing speeches are locked up because of copyright, as well as the fact that EMI is actually actively pursuing its copyright, is downright insane. If anybody ever needed even more proof the content industry is a vile, rotting, stinking and utterly putrid clump of pure, concentrated evil, this is it. Absolutely unbelievable.
Thread beginning with comment 503911
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I could care less
by phoenix on Thu 19th Jan 2012 19:17 UTC in reply to "I could care less"
Member since:


For crying out loud, the saying is "I couldn't care less". As in, you don't care about the issue at all. Zip, zero, zilch caring involved.

Saying you "could" care less, means you actually care about the issue, which is the exact opposite of what you are trying to say.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: I could care less
by james_parker on Fri 20th Jan 2012 22:10 in reply to "RE: I could care less"
james_parker Member since:

Actually, Vinegar Joe apparently cared enough to make this post; thus it can be argued that his "care value", while quite small, is greater than zero. Assuming that he could indeed have a "care value" of zero, we might then safely conclude that he could care less.

Reply Parent Score: 2