Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jan 2012 17:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 503949
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by shmerl
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 19th Jan 2012 23:47
in reply to "RE: Comment by shmerl"
That's not the point. You are buying a book, not Apple experience. Why should my book be tied to any single experience which one would be forced to buy to get the book? Apple acts indecently by bribing education circles with free (money wise) authoring software, but using locked in platform for publishing. There are already a bunch of standard ebook formats, which can be used on any platform. Apple's scorn of open standards is well known, and is clearly apparent in this case too.
Edited 2012-01-20 02:43 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-12
Wrong. They simple don't care to open their stuff for lets say Android. Why should they? They take the risk bringing new stuff to the table and cheap copyist earn with hardware sales at zero risk? That would be really stupid from a business point. It's like Google letting Bing use their page rank.
Apple wants to sell an experience which consists of hardware, software and contents. Why should they let other sell the same experience by letting them harvest the investment Apple put into this? Let's see the Samsung, HTC, Motorola, .. software that produces content for iPads. Oh sorry, there's no such thing. But everybody - especially Google, likes to earn money with the work / content of others.
And now mod me down for being "political OSNews incorrect".