Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jan 2012 23:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 503961
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
They aren't on the list at http://sopastrike.com but I don't think it's all-inclusive.
I thought about this as well, but I think I can see it happening in at least one way:
Some advert could by adverts for illegal products, or adverts from criminals simply advertising a non-existing product that no one would by anyway. By buying adverts they are transferring money from an criminal company to a legal company. If somehow the criminal advertiser and megaupload knew each other or had other legitimate business deals lopsided against megaupload, the money would eventually return to the criminals laundered.




Member since:
2006-12-05
That's ridiculous. Though the linked document reveals some issues with MegaUpload's, claiming the copyright infringement and money laundering is insane.
Does anybody know, whether MU participated in anti-SOPA blackout?