Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jan 2012 17:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 504069
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Done with OSNews nonsense.
by karunko on Fri 20th Jan 2012 19:51
in reply to "Done with OSNews nonsense."
The actual content is still your entirely and you are free to sell it on other services as long as i is not in iBooks form.
You are so wrong it actually hurts! The EULA reads:
B. Distribution of your Work
(i) [...]
(ii) a) [...]
(ii) b) Apple may determine for any reason and in its sole discretion not to select your Work for distribution.
I wonder what is going to be: pro Intelligent Design or against it? Did dinosaurs and men actually walk the earth together as someone would like us to believe? The mind boggles...
RT.
RE[2]: Done with OSNews nonsense.
by Anim8me2 on Sat 21st Jan 2012 15:25
in reply to "RE: Done with OSNews nonsense."
You are not disputing what I wrote,
"Apple may determine not to distribute this work" does not mean you can not distribute it in any other manner. The content is still yours. Period.
Also, this covers them from distributing the textbook equivalent of fart apps. Wouldn't there just be a bit of furor over that!




Member since:
2006-02-10
Yup, Thom... your ridiculous anti-Apple bias is pretty obvious. I read (past tense) OSNews for non-biased information about multiple OSs.
If you actually read the EULA you would understand that the only thing Apple says is that the wrapper (iBooks 2) is what you can't sell through other vectors. The actual content is still your entirely and you are free to sell it on other services as long as i is not in iBooks form.
Your take is the kind of ridiculous nonsense that keep me and others from reading tech blogs.