Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Oct 2005 21:27 UTC, submitted by mattst88
SkyOS "This [release] is a true gem for developers. SkyOS got a lot of under-the-hood work, the Integrated Streaming System and the networking stack have been reworked, the API has been standardised, missing libraries and functions have been added and a lot of bugs have been resolved. I think what we're seeing is a quasi-feature freeze. This actually serves its purpose, SkyOS is now much more stable, reliable and responsive than before."
Thread beginning with comment 50467
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: How is this news?
by on Mon 24th Oct 2005 08:50 UTC in reply to "RE: How is this news?"

Member since:

Thom Holwerda, while you are posting the above as a flamebait, you do have a point. You do know that development snapshots (aka alpha versions) are being made and the select team of alpha testers has been established just for the very purpose of quality assurance. This mechanism has proven itself to work quite good. You do have a point, because this rtl issue should have been fixed a long time ago, but obviously has been overlooked. The recent improvements in the network stack are a beginning to fixing all the relevant issues - including network driver bugs.
--
Tomasz Dominikowski, posting anonymously for security reasons from university.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[3]: How is this news?
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 24th Oct 2005 12:14 in reply to "RE[2]: How is this news?"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

while you are posting the above as a flamebait

How is it flamebait? Explain, please. Could be of course that your personal problems with me are to blame, but I await your explanation.

You do know that development snapshots (aka alpha versions) are being made and the select team of alpha testers has been established just for the very purpose of quality assurance.

All mighty fine, but do you and the other few alpha team members have the possibility to fix things? Or can you only report them? Can you look at the code to spot obvious errors that Robert's missed (much like we at OSNews review eachother's articles?). Are you all experienced enough coders to help Robert with fixing bugs, if you actually *could* look at the code? Or can you only say "xyz doesn't work, here's a debug log, have fun Robert"?

You do have a point, because this rtl issue should have been fixed a long time ago, but obviously has been overlooked.

Even though numerous debug logs were sent, information was provided-- months and months ago. Apparantly, OR Robert doesn't have the time to fix a pressing issue like this one, OR he is simply unsable to. In both cases, having more than one core developer would help.

So, I do not see how this could be perceived as flamebait. Aside from any personal souer, of course.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5