Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Jan 2012 22:53 UTC, submitted by fran
Thread beginning with comment 504724
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Is Canonical on crack?!? - Yes, they are...
by Jason Bourne on Fri 27th Jan 2012 01:11
in reply to "RE[3]: Is Canonical on crack?!? - Yes, they are..."
Menus with more than 10-15 items or nested more than 2 levels deep isn't one of those things.
I don`t see your reasoning valid being a systematic make-believe easy feature, from a geeky person. Do you really think a dumb will find an specific command just by searching? May suit you and the application you are very familiar with. However, the majority of people just won`t embrace this.
I still have complaints about how awful is the Windows 7 superbar window grouping behaviour. People don`t like changes.
Edited 2012-01-27 01:15 UTC
RE[5]: Is Canonical on crack?!? - Yes, they are...
by Soulbender on Fri 27th Jan 2012 04:02
in reply to "RE[4]: Is Canonical on crack?!? - Yes, they are..."
Do you really think a dumb will find an specific command just by searching?
Say what? A dumb? A dumb person?
What makes you think it would be easier for this (dumb?) person to use a deep and hard to navigate menu tree?
However, the majority of people just won`t embrace this.
You do not speak for the majority of the people.
People don`t like changes.
That doesn't mean we, as an industry, should not innovate new things.
RE[4]: Is Canonical on crack?!? - Yes, they are...
by ilovebeer on Sun 29th Jan 2012 16:53
in reply to "RE[3]: Is Canonical on crack?!? - Yes, they are..."





Member since:
2005-08-18
Menus with more than 10-15 items or nested more than 2 levels deep isn't one of those things.