Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Jan 2012 09:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 504753
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"I think it's only appropriate to not count as Android what cannot use legally the "Android" trademark -- which includes both the Nook and the Fire.
If that is the case, should a jailbroken iOS device be counted in Apple's numbers? "
A jailbroken iOS device is equivalent to a rooted Android device, no one is saying rooted Android devices shouldn't be considered in the Android count. We're talking about devices (e.g. the Fire) which are not claiming or trying to be an Android(tm) device, they just happen to be using a heavily modified version of the open source Android release as the basis for a custom proprietary device.





Member since:
2011-04-25
I think it's only appropriate to not count as Android what cannot use legally the "Android" trademark -- which includes both the Nook and the Fire.