Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jan 2012 22:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 504771
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Alternative perspective
by Tony Swash on Thu 26th Jan 2012 19:44
in reply to "RE[4]: Alternative perspective"
"Google artificially ranks Google services such as Google+ above other sites (such as Twitter or Facebook) even when those non-Google sites clearly have vastly better and more up to date data.
I personally think the video is pretty damning but I urge you to watch it yourself
I personally think the video is pretty damning but I urge you to watch it yourself
I made my mind when its a video produced by… Twitter, Facebook & MySpace.
Companies competing for the same social space that also PUSHED GOOGLE AWAY FROM MAKING THEIR CONTENT INDEXABLE. They asked for this. Maybe they should ask for inclusion again rather than trying to manipulate public opinion. "
So did you actually watch it? How can you possible make your mind up based not on the content of the video but on who made it? That's so absurdly narrow minded.
If you did watch it do you think what Google is doing is OK?
The whole point of what was demonstrated in the video is that the data from places like Twitter and Facebook that is being demoted in search results is all 100% accessible by Google, it's data Google already has but which it chooses to obscure in search results in order to attack another company. Do you really think that is OK?
Facebook and anybody else should have the right to not share data with Google without Google artificially demoting their search results in order to put pressure on them and to promote Google services.
RE[6]: Alternative perspective
by Beta on Fri 27th Jan 2012 10:53
in reply to "RE[5]: Alternative perspective"
Facebook and anybody else should have the right to not share data with Google
They have that right, they exorcised their data from Google.
without Google artificially demoting their search results
Which is exactly the problem, how does Google with its algorithm ‘fairly’ rank data that’s opaque to them.
These companies cannot have it both ways.
RE[5]: Alternative perspective
by testman on Fri 27th Jan 2012 05:57
in reply to "RE[4]: Alternative perspective"
I made my mind when its a video produced by… Twitter, Facebook & MySpace.
Companies competing for the same social space that also PUSHED GOOGLE AWAY FROM MAKING THEIR CONTENT INDEXABLE. They asked for this. Maybe they should ask for inclusion again rather than trying to manipulate public opinion.
Companies competing for the same social space that also PUSHED GOOGLE AWAY FROM MAKING THEIR CONTENT INDEXABLE. They asked for this. Maybe they should ask for inclusion again rather than trying to manipulate public opinion.
Judging by your posting history, it's pretty clear you made your mind up long before watching the video.
RE[6]: Alternative perspective
by Beta on Fri 27th Jan 2012 10:49
in reply to "RE[5]: Alternative perspective"





Member since:
2005-07-06
I personally think the video is pretty damning but I urge you to watch it yourself
I made my mind when its a video produced by… Twitter, Facebook & MySpace.
Companies competing for the same social space that also PUSHED GOOGLE AWAY FROM MAKING THEIR CONTENT INDEXABLE. They asked for this. Maybe they should ask for inclusion again rather than trying to manipulate public opinion.