Linked by lemur2 on Thu 26th Jan 2012 22:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 504826
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And it would be perfect if they can make it lightweight as in KDE3, and reduce memory consumption.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKII7Yb75XE
According to this reviewer, who offers video hard evidence in support of his statements, KDE4 is easily lightweight enough to run very smoothly, even on low-resource systems such as netbooks.
"I was able to install this on a 900 MHz netbook".
Edited 2012-01-27 07:47 UTC
Yep.
And it would be perfect if they can make it lightweight as in KDE3, and reduce memory consumption.
And it would be perfect if they can make it lightweight as in KDE3, and reduce memory consumption.
This tired old bellyache again? You should check out the new razor-qt desktop then... It was designed just for those who can't let go of KDE 3.x
http://razor-qt.org/
Edited 2012-01-27 11:34 UTC
Yep.
And it would be perfect if they can make it lightweight as in KDE3, and reduce memory consumption.
And it would be perfect if they can make it lightweight as in KDE3, and reduce memory consumption.
KDE4 is modular, so to some extent, it is lightweight, if you only want a base-install and a few extra applications.
Even a default Windows XP installation is several GB in size, so KDE4 is lightweight compared to that.
Edited 2012-01-27 13:34 UTC





Member since:
2011-12-22
Yep.
And it would be perfect if they can make it lightweight as in KDE3, and reduce memory consumption.