Linked by lemur2 on Thu 26th Jan 2012 22:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 504832
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Your statement contradicts the KDE developers; clearly there was some code that was "boggin down the system" in some cases.
Indeed there was. The new code will be faster.
This does not mean that the previous code was unacceptably slow or overly bogged down. It wasn't ... KDE has been perfectly useable and more than acceptably fast and snappy for some time now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKII7Yb75XE
Kubuntu 11.10: "Right off the bat the first thing I noticed is that it is extremely snappy. Really, really snappy and responds extremely well. I was pretty impressed with just how smooth everything was."
Edited 2012-01-27 07:35 UTC
So clearly for some people it is fine, and for some people it is not. That's always the case; software tends to be judged by the worst-case though (as it should be), because those are the cases that still have to be fixed.
There's no need to maintain that everything is perfect in KDE-land, there are sore-spots just like in GNOME or any other software project.





Member since:
2007-12-10
Your statement contradicts the KDE developers; clearly there was some code that was "boggin down the system" in some cases.