Linked by lemur2 on Thu 26th Jan 2012 22:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 504881
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I ain't can't let go KDE3. Re-read my post, please?
And yes, I've checked razor-qt. It sure is interesting. Memory footprint's low too, but still not that user friendly.
And yes, I've checked razor-qt. It sure is interesting. Memory footprint's low too, but still not that user friendly.
I didn't misunderstand anything. One constant I always find in comments regarding KDE 4 is always the same folks who bitch and moan that KDE 4 is slow; it's a resource hog; it's glitchy. These are CLEARLY people who can't let go of the fact that KDE 3.x is over and haven't actually used (as in every day) a recent KDE version post 4.2. They repeat this tired old FUD time and time again and frankly there's no merit to these claims. I agree with Lemur. I've been using KDE 4.7.x on a chintzy little netbook and it runs circles about the anemic Windows 7 Starter that shipped with the netbook with full 3D accelerated desktop effects enabled and all my standard programs. It's time to get over it already.





Member since:
2006-07-16
And it would be perfect if they can make it lightweight as in KDE3, and reduce memory consumption.
This tired old bellyache again? You should check out the new razor-qt desktop then... It was designed just for those who can't let go of KDE 3.x
http://razor-qt.org/
Edited 2012-01-27 11:34 UTC