To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
From: http://blog.laptopmag.com/analyst-kindle-fire-nook-tablet-have-40-o...
"We asked the author of the study, Peter King, to estimate what percentage of Android’s tablet share is comprised of the Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet, and he told us it’s about 40 percent of that 39 percent number."
"If you back out the Fire and Nook Tablet from the latest numbers, King says the Android tablet market grew about 100 percent. That seems decent, but iPad sales grew 111 percent year over year. So even when you add together Samsung, Motorola, LG, ASUS, Acer, Toshiba, and everyone else who makes an Android tablet, they couldn’t surpass the iPad."
"For King, it’s an open question as to whether Amazon’s and Barnes & Noble’s success is really helping or hurting Google. “These tablets are loosely based on Android, which is not accessing Google services and not accessing Google apps at market.” In other words, devices like the Fire are really helping Amazon more than Android."
Looks like the author of the study this article is based on agrees with me.




Member since:
2005-11-14
The RIM Playbook doesn't run Android. The Kindle fire does. Invalid correlation. You can run some Windows applications in Linux using Wine, yet, the operating system is still Linux. Since we know that Linux isn't a Windows kernel, companies don't brand it as such, and it's obvious, then such a claim would be dumb.
Yes they do. Jeff Bezo, Amazon's CEO, even stated such several times in the unveiling of the Kindle Fire. Repeating an inaccuracy over and over again will not change reality. Watch the announcement here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfpWDyL7BFY&feature=relmfu
Furthermore, they even brand their app store as "amazon appstore for Android".
So, that means the following:
1. It runs Android (that is a fact).
2. They claim it runs Android (that is a fact).
3. Their app store is branded as being for Android (that is a fact).
We are talking about Android's market share - not Google. Chrome OS isn't included in this discussion. The focus is on Android, which is exactly what Amazon is running. You're really grasping at straws here man.
See, you keep going back to making a false claim that has been proven as untrue already. Amazon claims it runs Android, it really does run Android, and they brand their store and being "for Android". They brand it as such, say it as such, and reality it is such.
Wow, what are you wanting? The words Android flashing on the front of the device? Again, let's review:
1. They claim it runs Android.
2. We all know it does run Android.
3. They even brand their app store as being "for Android".