Linked by lemur2 on Thu 26th Jan 2012 22:42 UTC
KDE KDE has announced its latest set of releases, providing major updates to KDE Plasma Workspaces, KDE Applications, and the KDE Platform. Version 4.8 provides many new features, and improved stability, performance and dynamic power management.
Thread beginning with comment 505114
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: KDE performance
by lemur2 on Mon 30th Jan 2012 09:40 UTC in reply to "KDE performance"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

My take on this issue is that while KDE4 is somewhat heavier than other environments, the difference in CPU usage or memory consumption does not matter much on most of the hardware people use.

The problem with KDE is that it puts strain on the underlying subsystems and hardware drivers. From my experience, it works fairly well on legacy hardware, where most of the new stuff is disabled anyway, or it requires top-notch drivers supporting all the new and fancy features. The ugly truth is that most of the linux hardware drivers are half baked and require application writers to carefully maneuver their way through supported features.

On my system KDE4.7 is constantly using 100% of one (of four) CPU cores. This of course makes the whole system run like crap but I doubt this is how it is supposed to work (I mean, no one could screw the implementation up so badly, even if he/she tried very hard). More likely, there is some conflict between KDE and some of the subsystems (audio in my case).

Ultimately, though, it is the job of KDE4 programmers and distributors to make their product work well. The users have all rights to complain if it is unusable out of the box and it is not their job to fix it.


Unfortunately your system is "broken" outside of KDE. As you speculate, the problem is most probably in the drivers you are using. This has nothing to do with KDE. KDE itself, on a normal working system, simply does not behave anything like you describe.

KDE developers make a product that performs extremely well for millions upon millions of users on many hundreds (if not thousands) of different systems. It is not at all a "heavy" environment, as you speculate. One only has to run KDE on an under-resourced netbook to realise this. KDE4 programmers and distributors HAVE MADE their product work well.

KDE developers do not have any particular obligation to fix your particular system's graphics drivers (or whatever the problem, external to KDE, might happen to be on your particular system). Once again, it is NOT the job of KDE developers o fix problems in graphics drivers with some obscure card or another.

Have you submitted a detailed bug report to the graphics driver developers?

If you haven't done so, I'm afraid you have no "rights" at all to complain. KDE developers simply don't have to cater to your unique isolated problems with other parts of your particular system.

Edited 2012-01-30 09:55 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: KDE performance
by ndrw on Mon 30th Jan 2012 11:16 in reply to "RE: KDE performance"
ndrw Member since:
2009-06-30

Have you submitted a detailed bug report to the graphics driver developers?


I didn't bother with it because I found the solution myself. Xfce.

Reply Parent Score: 2