Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Jan 2012 20:39 UTC
General Unix Finally something really interesting to talk about. If you've used UNIX or any of its derivatives, you've probably wondered why there's /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin in the file system. You may even have a rationalisation for the existence of each and every one of these directories. The thing is, though - all these rationalisations were thought up after these directories were created. As it turns out, the real reasoning is pretty damn straightforward.
Thread beginning with comment 505182
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: About time...
by Aristocracies on Mon 30th Jan 2012 21:31 UTC in reply to "RE: About time..."
Aristocracies
Member since:
2010-06-15

I've answered this here: http://www.osnews.com/permalink?505180

But in case you also want to hear it from more official people: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMe...

It simply makes more sense to do it /usr, that way it is possible to contain everything of that nature onto its own separate file system that could then be snapshotted, shared and mounted however you need it. Symlinking /bin, /sbin, etc into /usr gives you additional compatibility as a freebie since everything will exist in both locations.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: About time...
by shmerl on Mon 30th Jan 2012 22:59 in reply to "RE[2]: About time..."
shmerl Member since:
2010-06-08

Sounds good, but the name itself is totally obsolete. It could be renamed from /usr to /system or something, but I guess legacy weight is too big for it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: About time...
by Carewolf on Mon 30th Jan 2012 23:22 in reply to "RE[3]: About time..."
Carewolf Member since:
2005-09-08

Don't break things if you don't have to. You can always present it in a nicer way in the GUI, but don't break things if you don't have to..

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: About time...
by r_a_trip on Tue 31st Jan 2012 09:17 in reply to "RE[3]: About time..."
r_a_trip Member since:
2005-07-06

Sounds good, but the name itself is totally obsolete. It could be renamed from /usr to /system or something, but I guess legacy weight is too big for it.

Why? What is wrong with Unified System Resources? :-D

Reply Parent Score: 4