Linked by David Adams on Tue 31st Jan 2012 23:46 UTC, submitted by sawboss
Hardware, Embedded Systems When the Raspberry Pi ships later this year, it will be delivered to your door as a finished unit. The more adventurous tinkerers among you, as well as adept system builders, have asked the Raspberry Pi Foundation why they can’t get them in kit form instead. The reason why that wasn’t considered is demonstrated in an image released by Broadcom . . . they are tiny. And unlike a typical system build using an x86 chip that just slots into place, installing these chips requires a very steady hand and just the right amount of solder.
Thread beginning with comment 505357
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Having done surface mount
by deathshadow on Wed 1st Feb 2012 03:14 UTC
deathshadow
Member since:
2005-07-12

using a toaster oven to do the flow with masks and paste on stuff NOWHERE near as small -- it's best they put them out pre-built; Unless they make a massive DIP version of that chip it's just too easy to screw it up unless you happen to have a real fab facility in your garage.

Though a larger board version with more 'breakout' pins could be really nice -- the people who want to tinker and build with them could really use that sort of thing; See the Arduino and it's kin.

Sad but good for a laugh the open sores whackjobs are already pouring out of the woodwork bitching about binary distribution and closed source stuff on them... as if that will matter to 99.99% of real people who aren't DUMB ENOUGH to drink the FSF kool-aid.

Rah, rah, rage against the man over inconsequential nonsense... again someone needs to explain "freedom" to these people.

Edited 2012-02-01 03:17 UTC

Reply Score: -1

RE: Having done surface mount
by Elv13 on Wed 1st Feb 2012 03:56 in reply to "Having done surface mount"
Elv13 Member since:
2006-06-12

There is a shield board that go on top of it and add ~100 GPIO. It should be available with the board, so you can pay a few extra buck to have the Pi and the shield at day 0.

Reply Parent Score: 4

deathshadow Member since:
2005-07-12

Good to know, but cannae find a link to info on that -- where did you see that?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Having done surface mount
by Laurence on Wed 1st Feb 2012 09:18 in reply to "Having done surface mount"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26


Sad but good for a laugh the open sores whackjobs are already pouring out of the woodwork bitching about binary distribution and closed source stuff on them... as if that will matter to 99.99% of real people who aren't DUMB ENOUGH to drink the FSF kool-aid.

Rah, rah, rage against the man over inconsequential nonsense... again someone needs to explain "freedom" to these people.

Given that the Pi was originally intended as a cheap programmers board, you must at least see their point?

For me, as long as Linux installs (which obviously it will), I'll be happy. The fact that Arch has already been ported to it is just the icing on the cake ;)

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE: Having done surface mount
by Neolander on Wed 1st Feb 2012 16:25 in reply to "Having done surface mount"
Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

As said by Laurence, if they market this as a product for ARM developers, they must understand that there are more OSs than Linux on this market.

It is not Raspberry Pi that is at fault though. AFAIK Broadcom do not provide a decent amount of specs on their hardware.

Reply Parent Score: 1

Neolander Member since:
2010-03-08

-specs +reference documentation. Stuff that open-source drivers can be built with.

(We may complain with our closed GPU and networking hardware on x86, but the ARM guys have it far worse. On current ARM devices, it seems that the most trivial things (such as text I/O) require binary blobs.)

Reply Parent Score: 2

Flatland_Spider Member since:
2006-09-01

It's aimed at being a cheap computer for kids to play with, and hopefully get them interested in programming. There is just a pent up demand for an easy to use ARM board in the developer community.

The community should take care of porting other operating systems to the Pi, but the focus of the foundation is on a easy to use package. Arch Linux plus the Pi board provides an ready environment to begin experimenting.

Yeah, it really is Broadcom's fault the drivers are blobs. The head guy behind the Pi works for Broadcom and was one of designers of the chip, so FOSS drivers could be written from what is in his head if Broadcom would sign off on it.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE: Having done surface mount
by dnebdal on Wed 1st Feb 2012 19:45 in reply to "Having done surface mount"
dnebdal Member since:
2008-08-27

"Sad but good for a laugh"
"the open sores whackjobs"
"pouring out of the woodwork bitching"
"99.99% of real people"
"DUMB ENOUGH to drink the FSF kool-aid"
"Rah, rah, rage against the man"


... you're not a fan of sensible debating, I gather?

Edited 2012-02-01 19:46 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 6