To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The iPhone 3GS is still very expensive unless it is subsidised by a carrier. It costs AUD429 outright in Australia. This is 4x the price of similar Android hardware such as the Huawei X3 (AUD99).
Apple can't compete with $50 Android phones. Apple is already losing marketshare very quickly in China.
Edited 2012-02-02 04:46 UTC
You're right of course - the 3GS isn't cheap when paid for outright. Very few people do that though, and most get a phone that's subsidised by their carrier. Often that means that you'll end up on a more expensive talk plan though.
As for Apple not being able to compete with $50 Android phones, well, if an Android phone can be manufactured for $50 then an iOS phone can too. Apple is making a choice to not make phones so cheap though.
And on Apple losing marketshare very quickly in China, I don't really buy that, at least not in any meaningful way. Apple have only been selling iPhones in China for just over a year, and on only one carrier (not a particularly big one), so they have not had time to build up a significant marketshare there yet.





Member since:
2006-01-16
Apple have kept the iPhone 3GS available in order to provide a low-cost option...
The fact that components for smart phones are becoming increasingly cheaper applies just as much to iPhones as well as Android phones. I would not be surprised to see Apple replace the 3GS with a different low-end model later this year.