Linked by ddc_ on Thu 2nd Feb 2012 23:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 505726
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I use almost only FOSS software but if someone wants to sell their closed-code for profit that's none of my business. I'll probably never buy their product in a million years but that's my choice.
But that is the point entirely. FSF is not trying to get proprietary software outlawed. It is trying to get people to see the benefits of FOSS only.
The outcome is still the same though. If the majority of consumers forego proprietary for FOSS, there won't be much of a proprietary market left.
As an aside: Distributions are free to follow the FSF guidelines or not. So all pure FOSS distro's do so of their own volition.
I'll probably never buy their product in a million years but that's my choice.
with drivers you have no choice. If the blobs are not platform specific they count as firmware. Otherwise it is anti-competitive, immoral and possibly illegal.
It seems that UEFI would solve this problem with bytecode drivers in UEFI. But don't hold your breath. If the process is not standardized with standard cross-platform exported interfaces (but with user-space blobs), it would mean the death of FOSS.




Member since:
2005-08-18
Like...Skype and Kazaaaaaaaaa and comet cursors and bonzai buddy?
Just pulling your leg though...
Yeah, this thing annoys me too. I use almost only FOSS software but if someone wants to sell their closed-code for profit that's none of my business. I'll probably never buy their product in a million years but that's my choice.