Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 5th Feb 2012 19:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 506036
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-18
But "Start > Shut Down > OK" really doesn't make sense. Especially when Microsoft designed the Start menu to "start" just about everything you wanted to do from it. It was ironically also the place to go to restart or stop what you're doing.
It makes no sense, but well... it works. So I can't really complain. It's gotta go somewhere, I guess... and apparently no one at Microsoft felt like coming up with a better place for it. Programs, Documents, Pictures, Music, ... Shut Down? Okay... whatever.
I still don't understand the difficulty, because when you click the start button, the shutdown button is one of the first things you see. And back when everything was done through the start menu, it was hard to avoid.
Again, maybe it's just me. Maybe I'm one of those people that tend to adapt well. I work on z/OS mainframes in my day to day job and I didn't find it hard to adjust to them either. I certainly didn't understand why everyone was telling me "it's so different from what you're used to" when it was almost the same to my mind: hierarchical - just a different set of hierarchies - but still hierarchical.