Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Feb 2012 09:58 UTC, submitted by gogothebee
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu This shouldn't come as a huge surprise. Jonathan Riddell, lead developer of the Kubuntu project and the only person paid by Canonical to work on the KDE variant of the popular distribution, has announced that after the 12.04 release, Canonical will no longer be funding him, effectively putting Kubuntu on the same level as other Ubuntu variants like Xubuntu.
Thread beginning with comment 506389
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: No surprise
by BallmerKnowsBest on Wed 8th Feb 2012 17:40 UTC in reply to "RE: No surprise"
BallmerKnowsBest
Member since:
2008-06-02

You misunderstand the implications.

1. Kubuntu does not equal KDE as a whole.
2. Kubuntu is a community distro and a lack of funding does not equal death. Many distros exist with $0 funding.
3. You have been sniffing glue if you think that KDE is less configurable than then Gnome3.

Please think before you speak.


1. And where did I say it did? (Hint: I didn't)
2. Now that the rats have started deserting that sinking ship, it's only a matter of time.
3. Oh yeah? Show me the KDE equivalent of GConf!

Clearly you're just trolling because you're jealous of GNOME's popularity and success.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: No surprise
by Nth_Man on Wed 8th Feb 2012 19:36 in reply to "RE[2]: No surprise"
Nth_Man Member since:
2010-05-16

Now that the rats have started deserting that sinking ship, it's only a matter of time.

"Out of the 25 people who notably contributed in the past year, 1 person was employed by Canonical to do so (i.e. 4% of general Kubuntu work was financed by Canonical)." And he has not left the ship. And he doesn't like being called "rat", don't you think? :-|

[From https://apachelog.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/how-kubuntu-did-not-chang...]

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: No surprise
by cdude on Thu 9th Feb 2012 07:12 in reply to "RE[2]: No surprise"
cdude Member since:
2008-09-21

The KDE equivalent of GConf is KConfig. You can edit the config-files manually if you like (not possible with gconf) but you don't need to.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: No surprise
by Soulbender on Thu 9th Feb 2012 12:16 in reply to "RE[2]: No surprise"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

3. Oh yeah? Show me the KDE equivalent of GConf!


Thankfully KDE does not have GConf or anything like it (binary config files? seriously? Are we back in 1990 and I'm using DOS?).
There's an API for config files and all the config files are plain text.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: No surprise
by Hiev on Thu 9th Feb 2012 14:33 in reply to "RE[3]: No surprise"
Hiev Member since:
2005-09-27

Well, I have something to say about they choice to use text based files as configuration, is not that is bad, it is that their choice was to use some type of malformed kind of .ini files.

Edited 2012-02-09 14:35 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1