Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Feb 2012 00:09 UTC, submitted by moondevil
Windows As you all know, Windows 8 will be the first release of Windows NT which supports the ARM architecture. Microsoft hasn't been particularly forthcoming about this new Windows variant, but that's changing today. The company has posted a long and in-depth blog post about Windows 8 on ARM.
Thread beginning with comment 506589
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: I'm confused
by MollyC on Fri 10th Feb 2012 05:45 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: I'm confused"
MollyC
Member since:
2006-07-04

They also wanted users to be able to use Windows Explorer and other utilities. And the desktop version of IE10 (which supports plugins like Flash; the Metro version of IE10 supports no plugins, relying purely on HTML5 for fancy stuff).

I look at it like this: They want Metro users to be able to drop down to a lower level where Windows Exploerer and whatnot can be run, just like today WIndows users can drop down to the command line to run certain utilities.

As for porting Office to Metro, the problem there is that WinRT only supports a subset of Win32. So a Metro version of Office would require a significant rewrite, that would take too long for the next release. Office 16 will probably be purely Metro, but there's not enough time to do it for Office 15.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[6]: I'm confused
by malxau on Fri 10th Feb 2012 06:17 in reply to "RE[5]: I'm confused"
malxau Member since:
2005-12-04

And the desktop version of IE10 (which supports plugins like Flash...


All well and good, but since Flash is not a metro app, and only metro apps are allowed, will it be available? Would Adobe be allowed to do this if they wanted to?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[7]: I'm confused
by Adam S on Fri 10th Feb 2012 15:57 in reply to "RE[6]: I'm confused"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

All well and good, but since Flash is not a metro app, and only metro apps are allowed, will it be available? Would Adobe be allowed to do this if they wanted to?


No, because they already stated that IE10 won't support plugins.

Reply Parent Score: 1