Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Feb 2012 00:09 UTC, submitted by moondevil
Thread beginning with comment 506954
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I love Vim as much as the next guy, but I wouldn't want to do my serious .NET work in it. If you haven't used Visual Studio + ReSharper, you might think that you're just missing out on a few frills. I'll say this, though: I am much more productive with the "frills" of Visual Studio and ReSharper than I am with just a plain text editor. The latter is fine for hobby projects, or projects written in C/C++, which lack the metadata and overall structure to be parsed and used by tools like ReSharper. When it's time to get work done, I'm going to use a powerful tool that'll let me get it done quickly and correctly. For C#, Vim is not that tool.
Even for C/C++ Visual Studio is much more better than Vim.




Member since:
2006-01-02
I love Vim as much as the next guy, but I wouldn't want to do my serious .NET work in it. If you haven't used Visual Studio + ReSharper, you might think that you're just missing out on a few frills. I'll say this, though: I am much more productive with the "frills" of Visual Studio and ReSharper than I am with just a plain text editor. The latter is fine for hobby projects, or projects written in C/C++, which lack the metadata and overall structure to be parsed and used by tools like ReSharper. When it's time to get work done, I'm going to use a powerful tool that'll let me get it done quickly and correctly. For C#, Vim is not that tool.