Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Feb 2012 19:26 UTC
In the News The first big hurdle has been taken by Google and Motorola Mobility. The European Union has given the green light for Google to proceed with its acquisition of Motorola Mobility. The EU will, however, monitor the deal and its outcome for potential patent abuse. Update: And there we go, the US DoJ has approved the deal as well. Update II: The just-linked DoJ report also approves the Nortel patent sale to Apple, Microsoft, and RIM. I'm hoping for lots of fireworks here so the patent system blows up in Google's, Microsoft's and Apple's faces, so we can point and laugh about all the money they wasted.
Thread beginning with comment 507077
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Huh?
by JAlexoid on Tue 14th Feb 2012 10:35 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Huh?"
JAlexoid
Member since:
2009-05-19

Samsung did exactly the same as Motorola and now they are investigated by the EU commission.

Shows exactly how little you know about the differences between Motorola and Samsung case.
Samsung changed the licensing agreement with Qualcomm to exclude Apple from being a licensee, that is why they are being investigated.

Motorola and Apple never had a licensing agreement, but they are actually negotiating over the future. While the past is treated by both parties as they see fit. Apple wants to invalidate, Moto wants injunctions. Both violate the R in FRAND.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[8]: Huh?
by jared_wilkes on Tue 14th Feb 2012 13:27 in reply to "RE[7]: Huh?"
jared_wilkes Member since:
2011-04-25

No, you are mistaken. Motorola retroactively changed both the Infineon and Qualcomm license. Whereas Samsung claims that Qualcomm doesn't extend any patent rights to third parties like Apple.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[9]: Huh?
by JAlexoid on Thu 16th Feb 2012 01:00 in reply to "RE[8]: Huh?"
JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

Well Infineon's license applies to Apple. Only Qualcomm's chips are in breach. Terminated not retroactively, though.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: Huh?
by majipoor on Tue 14th Feb 2012 14:32 in reply to "RE[7]: Huh?"
majipoor Member since:
2009-01-22

"Shows exactly how little you know about the differences between Motorola and Samsung case."

Shows exactly how little YOU know apparently:

http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2012/02/apples-us-antisuit-lawsuit-...

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[9]: Huh?
by JAlexoid on Thu 16th Feb 2012 00:53 in reply to "RE[8]: Huh?"
JAlexoid Member since:
2009-05-19

Even reading that(first time I confess), I still stand that there are differences in both cases.
I might be proven wrong when they disclose the MMI-Qcomm contract. But so far, MMI has not cancelled the patent licensing retroactively, unlike Samsung did.

Reply Parent Score: 2