To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Indeed, it would be good if non-Windows ARM devices benefitted from the ARM standardization that Microsoft try to bring on the table for Windows 8.
Here's to hoping that most OEMs will attempt to reduce their manufacturing costs by using the same standards everywhere...
Edited 2012-02-16 10:53 UTC
The other side of the coin is that you cannot mod,alter or remove the OS. So the fact that there are standards, for us at least, there isn't any discernible benefit.
That is, unless they start selling completely open tablets with the same architecture...
My meaning of benefit was the same that Harlan pointed out : as forced to add these interfaces for windows anyway producers will start putting them in android devices enmasse as well. That will enable upstream Linux support and lower the barrier for kernel upgrades.
The problem is that MS knows that as well. They talk about windows dedicated HW and may implement number of IP traps in those standards to make it impossible for open systems to embrace them. They don't have to look at Intel any more.
The designs will soon reach general public and work for finding assorted patents and relevant prior art should start NOW.
Google shoud have come up with this 2 years ago. This is an area where they seriously lab behind MS in os development.
Edited 2012-02-16 12:20 UTC




Member since:
2005-09-01
Your former employer has already forced MS to support an additional SOC (ST Ericcsson Novathor ) in WP. With Win8 o believe the situation will more resemble one with Windows. MS is enforcing a number of PC-like interface standards so o guess only manufacturers who adapt will be given invitation.
In the longer term this should beneft android platform as well.