Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 16th Feb 2012 14:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 507451
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Are you eager to bet? Or are you spreading FUD as well?
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 16th Feb 2012 16:25
in reply to "Are you eager to bet? Or are you spreading FUD as well?"
I insist -being sorry.
by pfortuny on Thu 16th Feb 2012 16:40
in reply to "RE: Are you eager to bet? Or are you spreading FUD as well?"
RE[2]: Are you eager to bet? Or are you spreading FUD as well?
by polaris20 on Thu 16th Feb 2012 17:12
in reply to "RE: Are you eager to bet? Or are you spreading FUD as well?"
RE[2]: Are you eager to bet? Or are you spreading FUD as well?
by lucas_maximus on Thu 16th Feb 2012 20:19
in reply to "RE: Are you eager to bet? Or are you spreading FUD as well?"



Member since:
2006-02-05
Because otherwise
[quote]
In Mac OS X 10.9, the master switch and force-install will be ever harder to find or relegated to CLI commands - after which it is removed completely.
[/quote]
is just as moot and FUD as any other statement. Like 'linux desktops are are crap' or something.
If you do not set a specific time in the future when Gatekeeper will disappear then you will always be true.
I can win also: Linux will fail in the end. And BSD, for that matter. And Windows and OS X.