Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 16th Feb 2012 14:46 UTC
Mac OS X Well, this is a surprise. Several websites have a preview up of Apple's next Mac OS X release - it's called Mountain Lion, and continues the trend of bringing over functionality from iOS to Mac OS X. Lots of cool stuff in here we've all seen before on iPhones and iPads, including one very, very controversial feature: Gatekeeper. Starting with Mac OS X 10.8, Apple's desktop operating system will be restricted to Mac App Store and Apple-signed applications by default (with an opt-out switch), following in Windows 8's footsteps.
Thread beginning with comment 507564
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by kaiwai
by WorknMan on Fri 17th Feb 2012 01:41 UTC in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by kaiwai"
Member since:

If you have a room with a door quite a few people are going to want to explore the other side of those doors; Some will like it, others won't, and many will be scared to even open the door. Now If you put a wall in the way, how many will go see the other side? How many will even know?

To make the analogy fair, it's not really a wall. (If they put a restriction that made it not possible to install apps other than the app store, THAT would be a wall.) In reality, it's more like a door with a dead bolt on it. But hey, let's roll with this ...

If we want to make this as accurate as possible, we would have to say that there is danger on the other side of the door (viruses, malware, etc), so we'll say there is a trap door on the other side, with a 10 foot drop, and no warning sign. So anybody who walks through the door is probably going to get hurt, unless they're very careful. Hence, the reason why there is the dead bolt.

Now, anybody who wants to see what's on the other side can go and ask for the key, and in the asking, will probably be warned about the trap door, and so are likely to be very cautious when walking through, which is GOOD. However, most people won't bother to ask, and that's ok. If everybody doesn't see what's on the other side, it's not the end of the world. Hell, most people probably wouldn't care about what's on the other side anyway.

Getting back to the real world, my point is that I think it's optimal to make people jump through a few hoops to fully unlock their devices. It keeps the non-curious people out of trouble, and it helps to warn the curious about what they might run into 'in the wild'.

But how are people supposed to get curious if their PCs are locked down? Wouldn't that put an end to people who are very knowledgeable about computers? Well, since cars these days are more like 'black boxes' that people don't know much about, does that mean there are no more mechanics or car enthusiasts? Of course not! Either you are naturally curious about computers/cars or you just want the f**king things to work. But those who are naturally curious about these things will always be inclined to tinker, and I think there will always be platforms for them to indulge. Not everybody in this world either needs or wants to be a goddamn computer genius.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[9]: Comment by kaiwai
by _txf_ on Fri 17th Feb 2012 08:33 in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by kaiwai"
_txf_ Member since:

Well, since cars these days are more like 'black boxes' that people don't know much about, does that mean there are no more mechanics or car enthusiasts?

People are generally less knowledgeable about cars, precisely because they have become black boxes, it is something of a vicious circle. Cars have also become much more complicated; That isn't a good reason to start hiding the information, I would say that it is all the more reason that information should be more visible.

Reply Parent Score: 4