Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Oct 2005 15:12 UTC, submitted by LinuxFanBoy
Thread beginning with comment 50765
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: DON’T READ THIS SH#T!!!
by archiesteel on Tue 25th Oct 2005 04:43
in reply to "RE[2]: DON’T READ THIS SH#T!!!"
RE[4]: DON’T READ THIS SH#T!!!
by on Tue 25th Oct 2005 09:41
in reply to "RE[3]: DON’T READ THIS SH#T!!!"
>I'm not sure what you mean, exactly. Are you talking about my comment (in which case you probably misunderstood it), or about the original poster's?
Both actually, if your post was meant as sarcasm I do apologize. There are some other posts that seriously sound like they believe such theories and sarcasm is harder to detect in writing then in speech.







Member since:
>You could also have titled your e-mail: "don't look at the man behind the curtain!"
>Just because some theories have conspiracy elements in them doesn't mean they're not true, conspiracies do exist. Just ask John McCain about his illegitimate black child...
If this turns out to be the future tone of OSNEW I am not coming back.