To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Strings are not particles sort of by definition; and there wouldn't be "smaller" beyond elementary ones. 3D chips aren't about miniaturisation (plus I believe they have the usual, if not more severe, power dissipation issues)
But yeah, we can(tm) - look how we're finally, after over 2k years, on the verge of getting around Archimedes' Law!
Hm, or maybe not.
zima,
"Strings are not particles sort of by definition; and there wouldn't be 'smaller' beyond elementary ones."
The theory, which is a clever interpretation of the statistical data we have available, could never the less be wrong. But yes it seems the OP jumped to the conclusion that strings could be "reprogrammed"; that might invalidate the premise that they are already programmed as they are to explain the universal laws of physics. Changing them would in affect create a different universe.
"3D chips aren't about miniaturisation (plus I believe they have the usual, if not more severe, power dissipation issues)"
3D chips will undoubtedly offer tremendous gains, yes the heat dissipation is a bummer. But what about superconductors?
Or here's another idea for thermal computers...
(no idea about the plausibility of such a thing though)
http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/devices/thermal-transistor-the-...





Member since:
2007-04-13
There will be some invention that uses strings or smaller particles or finds some way to use 3 D computing or some other improvement.