Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Feb 2012 17:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 508437
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Nobody is forcing you to use all tools that are part of Visual Studio.
You do not need Report Designer? Then don't use it. You do not need XSLT debugger? Don't use it, etc.
You do not need Report Designer? Then don't use it. You do not need XSLT debugger? Don't use it, etc.
I have no beef with Visual Studio having lots of features. Eclipse has too, and eclipse is a fine IDE.
Extra features do not make the IDE significantly worse, but I'm arguing they don't make it significantly better either.
"Some people consider Testing, collaboration, version management, etc. to be fundamental in the software development cycle.
And professionals are perfectly capable of using discrete tools for these purposes. "
Capable of, yes - but that doesn't mean they *want* to use separate tools. There are a lot of advantages in having version control integrated with your code editor - annotated views to show recent changes within a file, syntax-aware tools for resolving merge conflicts, etc.





Member since:
2008-12-26
And professionals are perfectly capable of using discrete tools for these purposes.