Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Feb 2012 17:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 508567
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by WorknMan
by Chrishas on Mon 27th Feb 2012 01:06
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by WorknMan"
SMS is still alive and well, It's the biggest mobile revenue source:
http://mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats#...
It's everywhere and just works unlike coverage/pricing problems with 3G/4G connections.




Member since:
2005-07-12
Blablabla.
This was not his point at all. The iPhone was not about being better by putting even more stuff into a phone (with this kind of thinking, there is never any ground braking device ever because there is always a device somewhere that "has feature X" which the new device does not support. In fact, I'm glad that superfluous dinosaur tech like SMS and MMS are about to die due to the smartphones success).
You totally miss the fact that:
1) user friendlyness is not about putting any possible hardware extension or protocol into a device (I know because I still use the Nokia N95 which was legendary for having "anything". But the N95 is horrible to use so most features are not used at all).
2) that all smartphone devices nowadays are heavily influenced by the iPhone. Calling Apple a "follower" obviously misses the point. While they are not always the inventor, they are definitively better at then others as innovators (=bringing invention to market success).
E. g. http://iphonefizz.wordpress.com/tag/tablets-and-smartphones-before-...
If Apple's success is only because of their die hard followers, then please explain me why Linux - having at least as many fundamentalistic followers - never materialized in masses on the desktop.