Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 26th Feb 2012 11:39 UTC, submitted by RichterKuato
Thread beginning with comment 508583
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Where's the awesomeness?
by zima on Sun 4th Mar 2012 22:45
in reply to "RE[2]: Where's the awesomeness?"
For most people "doing work" (and much more), resolution probably isn't about cramming maximum amount of information anymore (that actually can be easily harmful) - more about making it clean & clearly digestible (which includes even how nice the fonts look), this is the style & approach they prefer (and not only them - kinda related pic: http://www.kyon.pl/img/17243,powerpoint,Edward_Tufte,wallpaper,kitt... ; this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VC10FlightDeck.jpg too wasn't very optimal, modern glass cockpits are an improvement, also because one can see less at a time, what is needed)
Edited 2012-03-04 22:50 UTC




Member since:
2005-08-26
I don't buy bigger monitors because I like bigger buttons and more padding. I buy bigger monitors with higher resolutions so that I can do and see more at one time. This whole attitude of wasting people's monitor real-estate with big fluffy objects on the screen really is quite annoying for those of that use our computers for doing work. It's not OK to waste my screen real-estate. It's really that simple. If we wanted the space of 1024x768 then we'd still be running that resolution on our monitors.