To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Have to agree on that. His statement re Linux distros is (IMO) correct, but recommending suicide on the internets is stupid - you never know what nutcase/zealot/idiot/gossip might be listening.
Not sure that this has any impact on FOSS usage though. I mean, Steve Jobs was an epic screwball and people still bought (and continue to buy) tons of Apple shit. *whistles*
"Am I the only one who is getting tired with all of his rants and with the attention they get?"
Maybe not, but I enjoy them quite a bit myself... and he raises some good points.
"However, does that gives him the permission to call other people 'morons' and 'mentally diseased' ALL THE TIME."
Why not? He can say whatever the hell he wants. Whether you agree or disagree, fine, argue if you want. But there's no reason to bitch about his choice of language.
"Worse yet, asking them to kill themselves?"
I honestly doubt that he meant that in a 100% serious, non-joking way. If anyone is getting pissed because they really think he is being completely serious, maybe they need to quit jumping at conclusions or consider anger management. Chances are, you're getting mad over nothing.
Does anyone else feels the same way?
I only have seven more words to say: shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.
If that gets you mad, go smoke a bowl and relax.
Anyway, I think we all can agree that Linux Torvalds has some attitude problems. I mean, why would you call OpenBSD developers for "masturbating monkeys" because they think security is important?
With a big ego such as Linus T, I doubt he would let anyone govern over his creation. I mean, if I created something, would I let someone else decide the name? Hell no.
There is no chance that "Linus T friend decided to call it Linux". With such a big ego, it was Linus T that decided to call it Linux.
As Stallman said: "I am not the one who calls GNU for Stallmanix" - implying that to name a creation after yourself requires some ego.
You're not the only one. I'm getting just as tired, especially because he's setting an example and people seem to think that it's okay to behave like that everywhere.
It's what leads to posts like this:
http://stormyscorner.com/2012/02/its-scary-to-join-an-open-source-p...
It's a pity, that due to his fame, and more importantly other people apparently blindly following and agreeing (or not blindly, but taking a considered view, and agreeing), and with news sites further highlighting his views, that he should be censored, and would not be allowed the same freedom as you or I.
Why is it, that I could say that, yet he can not?
Yes yes, fame, moral responsibility (and advocating shooting one's self is a bit extreme, but it's obviously meant in humour), however I don't think this is at all extreme, it is, as he said, a simple rant.






Member since:
2010-04-09
Am I the only one who is getting tired with all of his rants and with the attention they get?
He may be a smart person and he might be right about what he is ranting about. I'm also grateful for Linux and Git, and I kinda feel sorry for his daughter.
However, does that gives him the permission to call other people "morons" and "mentally diseased" ALL THE TIME. Worse yet, asking them to kill themselves?
I don't know but this is getting old, it causes too many issues in FOSS and people get negative and fight all the time.
Does anyone else feels the same way? *sigh* :-(
Edited 2012-02-29 00:07 UTC