Linked by David Adams on Thu 1st Mar 2012 22:53 UTC, submitted by judgen
Thread beginning with comment 509255
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
sadly British government like expensive and often vastly over-priced contracts with Microsoft, IBM and Oracle is simply because it takes liability away from the government.
If MS fsck up and take a government service offline, then IT managers within the government just say "not our fault, it's one of our service providers"
If MS fsck up and take a government service offline, then IT managers within the government just say "not our fault, it's one of our service providers"
Everybody likes to outsource responsibility. Certainly in some Central European places one can see a strong "nobody got fired for using Microsoft or Oracle" of sorts...
...and even when the projects, waaaaay down the line, largely prove to be practical failures - those initially pushing and implementing them moved on, several times already, each time adding another "success" to their CV - and the more expensive, the more lucrative such "successes" are, the better they look on the CV, it seems.




Member since:
2007-03-26
You know, I would have found this acceptable in someone's pet OSS project but not in a global service from MS that you probably pay an arm and a leg for.
If I was the guy who was responsible for this in "the government" I would have been having a serious talk with my account rep already and it would not have been easy for them convince me to continue using their product.
agreed, but sadly British government like expensive and often vastly over-priced contracts with Microsoft, IBM and Oracle is simply because it takes liability away from the government.
If MS fsck up and take a government service offline, then IT managers within the government just say "not our fault, it's one of our service providers". For the government, contracts like this are just another form of outsourcing and thus it would take something monumental and hugely publicly embarrassing before any government body would even consider switching providers - let along bring the services back in house where they really belong.
This is just my experiences when I worked for the British government. Things might be different for the rest of the EU or western world (for their sake, I hope so).
Edited 2012-03-02 09:15 UTC