Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Mar 2012 16:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 509584
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links




Member since:
2009-04-25
I have heard the same argument across the web, some people feel switching back and forth from "legacy desktop" to the metro desktop is counter productive. A lot of people are wondering why do they have to leave one desktop to launch a program just to end back up in the original desktop they were working on in the first place.
Another thing that is really ticking off some people is that Microsoft is forcing people to use the new UI without the option to use the old UI. In the past Microsoft allowed to customize the desktop UI experience. In Windows 95 you had an option to use the Windows 3x Program Manager, Windows XP (and Vista) you were able to customize the start menu to look like Windows 9x.
I honestly think Microsoft should provide their user base with an option on which desktop they want to use with the ability to switch back and forth if they choose to. This is one thing I think Apple is shinning on right now. All the new features of Lion (and soon Mountain Lion) are optional with the option to be able to either turn them off or not use them at all.