Linked by David Adams on Mon 5th Mar 2012 22:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 509669
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Slightly dodgy summary...
by David on Tue 6th Mar 2012 17:16
in reply to "Slightly dodgy summary..."
RE[2]: Slightly dodgy summary...
by steve_s on Tue 6th Mar 2012 20:43
in reply to "RE: Slightly dodgy summary..."
David, I hadn't quite understood that this was convention for the right column, but I do think that you may need to modify your convention just a little to clear up the obvious ambiguities that can arise.
In this case the chosen paragraph was particularly problematic since it uses the first person, specifically in the sentence "There, I said it". Since there was no visible identification as to the source of the paragraph it really looks like the it's your opinion being presented.




Member since:
2006-01-16
The "summary" for this news article isn't a summary at all, it's the first paragraph of the article that's been linked to. Since the only name against this story is David Adams, it looks like David write that paragraph, whereas it was actually a chap called Eric Zeman.
Wouldn't it be more honest to at the very minimum put quotes around the summary text to make it slightly clearer that the text is a quotation? More honest still would have been to prefix the quotation with "Eric Zeman writes for InformationWeek:"...