To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Because .com does not represent the USA, it's short for commercial, what does a company based in the UK or Asia or wherever have to do with the US? Nothing, perhaps the US should just use it's own .us extension by default and create a new, better mechanism for handling .com in collaboration with the rest of the world. Maybe it's also time to use different extensions depending on the organisation/person registering a domain. CERN is also where www was developed, should it have exclusive rights over that?
Most people are not complaining about that .com .org and so on are under the US jurisdiction.
The problem is how they handle it:
http://www.osnews.com/story/25627/_US_government_is_scaring_web_bus...
And the problem seems to be getting worse.
I assume you posted this via OSNews's Usenet interface.
It turns out there's quite a popular service on the internet nowadays called the "World Wide Web". It was invented by an Englishman, working in Geneva for the European nuclear research agency.
You should give it a try some time, there's some quite good stuff on there.
Bah, stealing and/or taking credit for Europe's greatest stuff is practically a sport over here. Einstein? Yoink, worked at Princeton. Werner Von Braun? Yoink, helped start our space program. Timothy Berners Lee? Yoink, now an Ars Technica guy and member of the Cato Institute. Internetworking in general? Yoink.





Member since:
2012-03-06
The US funded everything that became the internet. It seems only reasonable that it got first pick of domains. If a person or a company does not want to have any US involvement, pick another TLD. That seems easy enough. There are a lot of options now. Not so in the beginning, but times have changed!