Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Mar 2012 23:04 UTC, submitted by Richard Lake
Thread beginning with comment 509924
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not open source...
by leech on Thu 8th Mar 2012 17:53
in reply to "RE[2]: Not open source..."
Oops, I kind of got ahead of myself on that matter.
What I was thinking was that if the backend libraries were ported to AROS, it wouldn't be that far of a stretch to also get them ported to native Workbench 3.x.
Kind of a backward way to be doing stuff how things would be if Commodore were still around and had allowed clones. The primary would get the port first, then all the 'clone' OSes. Then again I suppose AmigaOS 4 would have eventually came out.




Member since:
2011-01-14
Yep, AROS is 3.x API compatible, but not 4.x. There were changes in one of the OS4.1 updates specifically to add features required by Timberwolf, so even with the OS4.x code, it probably couldn't be compiled for AROS without a huge amount of further work.
As for whether it will end up as open source, I'm sure the minimum required by the licence will be done and no more. Whether that much is actually useful is another story...