To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm not sure what level of invasiveness they'll be allowed to use. It may be "only" monitoring traffic passively. (I say "only" here with great hesitation, can't believe we're living through an age when corporate spying on private communications is legal and acceptable). If it is passive, then encryption will be 100% safe against it.
On the other hand, if they're going to add participating nodes and tamper with packets to perform man in the middle attacks, then unauthenticated P2P encryption is useless since a client cannot know whether it's communicating to a real peer or the ISP's spy proxy. To resolve this, peers would need to authenticate using out of band (non-p2p) mechanisms. Conceivably centralized services could provide that authentication, but then there'd be little stopping the spies themselves from being authenticated.
On the other hand, tor proxies and the like do provide plausible deniability. I do wonder if tor users will have their internet service shut down on account of third party activities? If so, people using tor for perfectly legal private communications might be effectively prohibited keeping their traffic private in the future.
Hmm...you are right. I thought the torrent p2p encryption was better than it apparently is. It's just a fancy way to obfuscate the traffic.
I'm just waiting for the MPAA/RIAA mafia to lobby for making encryption illegal. Well, illegal for private citizens, that is.
Indeed, it can be pretty tricky to operate on individual packets. But every torrent and individual files in it have a hash advertised together by client, which is guaranteed to be rather unique. And probably, together with a couple of chunks of copyrighted data downloaded from users computer, can be enough to prove something beyond reasonable doubt or at least grant a search warrant, for example.
They probably will focus on top torrents and newly released material.
Not, if it is a CAM or TS downloaded well before actual release to the public.





Member since:
2005-08-18
It's not illegal to download copyrighted material, it all depends on the license of that material.
The logistics for figuring out if what you're downloading is illegal and violating someone's copyright is rather involving, at the ISP level.
* They'll have to capture enough packets to find out exactly what it is.
* They'll have to find out what license this material is under.
* They'll have to find out if you're allowed to download this or not. For example, maybe you purchased a legal copy that is distributed via BitTorrent.
Of course, they'll probably just wing it and do something like considering all torrent downloads illegal.