Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Mar 2012 19:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 510829
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
But I don't think there is a DRM-supporting container available for WebM either ?
Atleast I don't think containers are interchangable all that easily, are they ?
Atleast I don't think containers are interchangable all that easily, are they ?
VP8 can be used in Matroska and AVI containers as well as WebM, though WebM is just an extended form of Matroska. Matroska does not support DRM, AVI does not either but I've still seen several attempts from various companies at using an encrypted AVI-format.
Usually DRM is a function of protocol, though, not containers. Container-specific DRM applies only when the content is distributed via non-restriced streaming protocols or as actual files. There is nothing stopping someone from extending Matroska to support DRM, though, so that again is a non-issue.




Member since:
2006-01-28
WebM doesn't have that.
All people are asking for is to put all the non-DRM content in WebM.
DRM is usually a function of the container, as opposed to the codec. H.264 doesn't have DRM either, MP4 or M2TS do support encryption of the streams though.