Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th Mar 2012 22:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 510838
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Luminair
by static666 on Fri 16th Mar 2012 16:21
in reply to "RE: Comment by Luminair"
I see no trouble in implementing a customized automated bittorrent client that would impersonate a fellow seeder/leecher, requesting chunks of copyrighted content from users of particular IP address ranges, while logging all communication. No need for anything fancier IMO, in fact it may already be in place since it is so trivial.
Using tor is an overkill and could easily put it down. Another workaround is purchasing a private VPN proxy in some remote country where there is still free internets. Like Sweden, maybe, still?
But the best way is to stop buying crappy content made in Hollywood in the first place. C'mon, it's horrible, and is only getting worse every day.
RE[2]: Comment by Luminair
by Luminair on Fri 16th Mar 2012 16:34
in reply to "RE: Comment by Luminair"




Member since:
2005-12-18
Constant communication monitoring (or spying...) actually cost lots of money, and the costs scale proportional to the amount of users that you need do control.
You will have:
- the additional overhead of the automated infrastructure to filter the traffic together with all the technical glitches that the additional complexity add to the system.
- the need of technicians to keep everything running.
- the need of human censors to read the logs, and the admin personnel to coordinate them.
- lots lawyers to cope with the ocean of lawsuits and class actions that false positives and gray areas will bring to the company.
... and the list goes on ...
Who will pay? The customer! Of course!