Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Mar 2012 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 510990
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Netflix is a very different company then most software companies. They charge a monthly fee for access to content which is higher then most consumers are willing to pay to own even a great mobile app for their lifetime. Very few commercial software companies are not brining in $800 million a quarter. High quality software shops are much closer to "the individual guy" then most people realize and are far from the scale of Netflix.
It all comes down to simple economics. If the expense to support any platform cannot be justified by the income from that platform then a company can't afford to support it. For many software companies Android falls into this category. Until sales of Android software rise this is going to be the case.