Linked by Linux Review on Tue 20th Mar 2012 17:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 511277
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I just don't follow...
by Tuishimi on Tue 20th Mar 2012 22:01
in reply to "RE[3]: I just don't follow..."
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
Hi,
-------------
If you convince people that some free software is technically superior, they might run some free software, but they will remain ready to use nonfree software in the areas where that is technically superior. They will continue to judge an important question based on superficial issues. This is just a partial success.
-------------
If I am not convinced of this being an ethical issue in the first place surely preferring software that functions better is not superficial?
I think he wants people to use free software because it's free (not because it's better, and not because it's less expensive). If someone uses free software simply because it's better then it's less of a victory to him.
It's like an atheist who goes to a church for the bread and wine - I'm sure the church would prefer people attend for other reasons.
- Brendan