Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Mar 2012 21:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 511310
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-06-21
This question may well already be covered in the license. We probably shouldn't discuss enforceability because you posed an ethical question.
What terms did you receive the software on. If the "ad-supported" version is free to use, for anyone, with no restrictions, and it happens to serve up ads, than you are on fair ground blocking them. In this case the developer has sought no compensation from you - any revenues from advertising are incidental.
However, if you accept the application on the contingency that you also accept the ads, than you are bound ethically to allow them. Yes, it is your device, your battery, etc... You can exercise your prerogative by uninstalling the app.
The acceptance of advertising is, in the second case, in lieu of payment sought as compensation. If the developer makes this clear, than there is no ethical way around it.
If OSnews had a click-through login portal offering an option to pay for access or view an ad-supported version, it would be unethical to enter the ad-supported version and turn on an adblocker. However, OSnews does no such thing, and provides a public website that I can read without agreement on any point. Thus, blocking your ads would be perfectly ethical. Perhaps not very nice, but certainly fair.
Just my 2 cents...
Of course, if the app doesn't come with the source code, it may be otherwise unethical anyway ;-)