Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Mar 2012 21:01 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Because I've been spending days browsing through XDA, reading CM changelogs, and flashing nightly builds, I'm still in an Android state of mind, so excuse me for more talk on the subject. An interesting study has been performed which found that advertisements in Android applications are a huge battery drain - they account for up to 75% of an application's battery usage.
Thread beginning with comment 511417
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: websites?
by pandronic on Wed 21st Mar 2012 14:01 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: websites?"
pandronic
Member since:
2006-05-18

The "violent phrasing" is directed at people who take all the work that site owners do for granted. Most site owners are not rich, they are normal people, some do this for a living and can be dependent on the ad revenue to pay their mortgages and put their kids through school. Then some asshole (I'm not talking about you ;) ) comes and proclaims from behind his computer monitor that site owners should basically work for free for his enjoyment or benefit. How is that fair?

What I'm saying is that what I'd like to offer my users is a "take it or leave it" kind of deal - this is my website - either you use all of it, or none of it. Am I not reasonable?

That being said, I despise advertising. I think that a product should succeed or fail based on its merits and not on marketing campaigns and budgets. But that is not the world we live in. I'm also a fan of reasonably priced paywalls with proper trials. But then an asshole comes with crappy, but ad-supported "free" content and most users will go for that even if they would be better off paying for content in the long run, instead of wasting their time with half-baked copypasta. But again, that's the world we live in.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: websites?
by drcouzelis on Wed 21st Mar 2012 20:13 in reply to "RE[4]: websites?"
drcouzelis Member since:
2010-01-11

Then some asshole comes and proclaims from behind his computer monitor that site owners should basically work for free for his enjoyment or benefit. How is that fair?


I'm not saying that you have to work for free. I'm saying that people are not morally obligated to allow advertisements to be downloaded and displayed on their computers.

I assume someone will then respond to this with, "But then how will the website owner make money?" Well, I don't know, but if I did, I'd probably be rich.

Personally, I choose to browse the Internet without advertisements. I also have a website that I host for free without advertisements, but that's probably irrelavant since I only get about 10 visitors per month...

Reply Parent Score: 1