To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No, it means it does not use any bandwidth between the cell tower and the cell phones, since the SMS is passed inside a message that is send anyway by your phone.
However, the carrier still have to pay for transmitting your SMS from your tower to your recipient tower, and whether that cost 10cents or not, is debatable.
Also, SMS can send more than 140 characters (at least in Europe), I regularly do that. But then of course it does cost you "ceil(characters_count/140)*sms_cost"
Yup, I know about that, since I have learned to just enable unicode, type as much as I want, and deal with the neverending warnings coming from my phones and the obligation of finding a phone plan with unlimited texts.
I just wish it wouldn't be so complicated. Talk time is typically at 30 cents per minute for local calls here, and I doubt that a single text makes nearly as much use of the underlying infrastructure as 20 seconds of voice, even if it's heavily compressed.
Edited 2012-03-26 07:14 UTC
cyrilleberger,
"However, the carrier still have to pay for transmitting your SMS from your tower to your recipient tower, and whether that cost 10cents or not, is debatable."
I don't think it's debatable at all. Prepaid phone cards retail around $0.10/minute and deliver a far larger (and bidirectional) payload than an SMS. One could place a call, read the text out loud several times and get detailed feedback for the same price as one text. On todays cellular networks a hundred bytes costs practically nothing, but phone companies see no reason to evolve their highly profitable legacy fee structures. I guess there may be legacy limitations with SMS over GSM, but I think the limitations are kinda pathetic today.
Texting never really had much appeal to me, but even if it did I'd still find the prices to be a rip off.
Edit: If I had read ahead I would have seen that others already made the same points as me, oh well.
Edited 2012-03-27 01:30 UTC





Member since:
2010-03-08
Does this mean that in effect, carriers barely pay an extra in terms of bandwidth for every SMS message that is being sent and that they gently charge a hefty price for ?
This is even worse than I thought !
Edited 2012-03-26 06:56 UTC