Linked by Howard Fosdick on Tue 27th Mar 2012 03:39 UTC
Editorial My previous article analyzed some tech companies and their prospects: Microsoft, Intel, HP, Dell, Oracle, Apple, and Google. This article discusses IBM, Amazon, Yahoo!, Cisco, and BMC Software. The goal is to spark a useful discussion. What is your opinion of these companies? Do they have viable strategies for the future?
Thread beginning with comment 512193
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Amazon...
by JonathanBThompson on Wed 28th Mar 2012 22:26 UTC
JonathanBThompson
Member since:
2006-05-26

Is a jungle inside. Sure, it's a pun, but it's also 100% true! There's more than one reason they're hiring so many people, and it's not just for growth: Amazon swallows people and spits them out with how things are done in so many of their groups/departments. I'm sure there are some groups that use a good process and proper environments for QA and developers, but I can absolutely guarantee you based on first-hand experience working under their roof that some of what they do would make you cringe when it comes to process and environments. During the time I worked there in one group (just short of 9 months) the turnover was higher than the time I spent years ago as a pizza delivery driver in a chain pizza restaurant, and understandably so.

Amazon is the 8 billion pound gorilla in their space in many things: what they need to worry about long-term is competitors that execute better when it comes to quality and reliability of their systems, and attracting a large enough customer base (I'm not talking individuals buying stuff from them, but merchants, for the most part). Amazon, I feel, may allow themselves to grow too complacent in this regard, precisely for the same reason Microsoft (I've worked under their roof, too) allowed Windows quality to become a bad joke amongst many in the past: they had the dominant position, and didn't feel threatened enough to do a better job, since they didn't have much reason to fear customers going to someone else.

Reply Score: 2